Re: Shock Rebound
some ideas here, I might as well pass them on.
I was looking for some left-over O-rings in my tool-tray and got an idea of using something else as a spacer.
I just took a silicone of plastic tube (might be a fuel-tube for gas-engined RC-cars) and cut of some pieces with a Stanley knife.
I made them of several lengths and wrote down the length in mm on them, using a permanent marker.


I then cut them over the length.

It's now very easy to snap them on the shaft and use as a spacer ...


and then using the same spacer for the next shock, to obtain equal rebound amounts.
Now, it's at this point that I noticed that I did something wrong when previously building my shocks. ... well, wrong in my book.
I assembled them, as described in the manual and placed the bladder when the piston was fully extended.
With the piston fully extended, it became clear to me that the volume of my shocks when I make them the way I did, had to be under presure, and even getting a higher presure when mounted into the car and when driving. Also this must certainly have an effect on the performance or efficiency of the shock-springs as the higher shock-oil-pressure must react as a spring itself.
I noticed, when trying to obtain 50% rebound, that I had to almost fully push the piston in before putting on the bladder... and it's then that I recalled that my mates had told me before, this was a better way of mounting them.
So I was trying with my spacer, nr4 (see photo 2) and still got full rebound, spacer nr 3: full rebound ... and I realised the nr2 had to be OK ... or as is described higher on: the thickness of a simple O-ring
I was looking for some left-over O-rings in my tool-tray and got an idea of using something else as a spacer.
I just took a silicone of plastic tube (might be a fuel-tube for gas-engined RC-cars) and cut of some pieces with a Stanley knife.
I made them of several lengths and wrote down the length in mm on them, using a permanent marker.
I then cut them over the length.
It's now very easy to snap them on the shaft and use as a spacer ...
and then using the same spacer for the next shock, to obtain equal rebound amounts.
Now, it's at this point that I noticed that I did something wrong when previously building my shocks. ... well, wrong in my book.
I assembled them, as described in the manual and placed the bladder when the piston was fully extended.
With the piston fully extended, it became clear to me that the volume of my shocks when I make them the way I did, had to be under presure, and even getting a higher presure when mounted into the car and when driving. Also this must certainly have an effect on the performance or efficiency of the shock-springs as the higher shock-oil-pressure must react as a spring itself.
I noticed, when trying to obtain 50% rebound, that I had to almost fully push the piston in before putting on the bladder... and it's then that I recalled that my mates had told me before, this was a better way of mounting them.
So I was trying with my spacer, nr4 (see photo 2) and still got full rebound, spacer nr 3: full rebound ... and I realised the nr2 had to be OK ... or as is described higher on: the thickness of a simple O-ring
